Texas judge delays ruling in custody battle over newborn with heart defect
A Dallas judge has extended a temporary restraining order for 14 days, delaying a final decision on custody of a newborn with a severe heart defect. The case involves a California couple, Nausheen Gilkar and Omar Ahmed, and their surrogate, McKenna West, who moved to Texas to give birth after refusing their request to terminate the pregnancy. The infant, named Rumi by the parents and Gabriel by West, is in critical condition following surgery. West seeks sole medical conservatorship, while the couple asserts parental rights and alleges West breached their surrogacy contract.
Key points
- Dallas County Judge Ashley Wysocki extended a temporary restraining order barring West from seeing or making medical decisions for the child, with no final custody ruling issued.
- The newborn has hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) and is in critical condition after a Norwood procedure, requiring re-intubation and blood transfusions.
- West, an Alaska nurse, traveled to Texas to give birth after refusing the couple's request to abort the fetus, citing the child's high survival rate.
- The couple claims West violated their 2025 surrogacy agreement, which included a termination clause, and has filed counterclaims seeking over $100,000 in damages.
- Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton previously intervened to ensure life-saving care was provided but withdrew from the case after the initial surgery.
Background
This dispute follows a 2025 surrogacy agreement between the couple and West, who had previously undergone eight rounds of IVF and a hysterectomy. The case has drawn national attention due to conflicting state laws on surrogacy and abortion, with West receiving support from anti-abortion groups like Live Action and Alliance Defending Freedom. Earlier coverage noted the legal complexities of cross-state surrogacy contracts and the lack of federal regulation in this area.
How outlets are covering it
CNN and CBS News emphasize the emotional testimony of the parents, who assert the child is loved and wanted, and criticize West as 'unstable.' Fox News highlights the medical crisis, noting the baby's condition worsened after surgery, and frames the dispute around West's refusal to abort. KERA News provides a neutral legal analysis, detailing West's arguments that the California court lacked authority to designate the parents and that the surrogacy contract is invalid in Texas. All sources agree on the critical nature of the child's condition and the lack of a final judicial ruling.
Why it matters
The case highlights the legal and ethical complexities of surrogacy agreements across state lines, particularly regarding termination clauses and medical decision-making for infants with severe congenital defects. It underscores the lack of federal surrogacy laws and the potential for conflicting state regulations to create legal vacuums that endanger vulnerable infants.
What to watch
The judge has not set a specific date for the final custody ruling, but the temporary restraining order remains in effect for 14 more days. The child is expected to remain in critical care for at least 30 days, with further surgeries planned. West has stated she would drop custody claims if the court confirms the parents are committed to the child's life-saving care, but the couple denies refusing treatment.
- California couple confront their surrogate in a Texas court as dispute over newborn escalates CNN
- A Surrogate Fled to Texas to Avoid an Abortion. Now She Wants Custody of the Baby. The New York Times
- Surrogate, California couple clash in court as newborn fights for life after heart surgery Fox News
- Judge upholds restraining order, will rule on Alaska surrogate, California parents’ custody fight KERA News
- Dallas judge delays custody decision in surrogacy fight over newborn with heart defect CBS News
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on CNN