Supreme Court's Impact on Redistricting and Representation

The U.S. Supreme Court has directed the Ohio Supreme Court to reconsider the legality of the state's congressional districts, following its ruling in a North Carolina redistricting case. The high court rejected an expansive version of the "independent state legislature theory" but stated that state courts must still act within "ordinary bounds" when reviewing laws governing federal elections. This is the fourth redistricting case the Supreme Court has addressed this month. Republican state lawmakers in Ohio argued that their state's highest court had overstepped its authority in striking down U.S. House districts enacted by GOP officials. The ACLU believes that if the Ohio Supreme Court faithfully applies the North Carolina decision, the districts should be invalidated again.
- Supreme Court directs Ohio's top court to take another look at redistricting lawsuit CBS Pittsburgh
- The Supreme Court falls to Earth Axios
- Supreme Court’s election law case: How they ruled Deseret News
- Rooks: U.S. Supreme Court upholds representation and democracy Seacoastonline.com
- Editorial: Fairness requires a second Black-majority House district in Louisiana NOLA.com
Reading Insights
0
14
3 min
vs 4 min read
84%
717 → 117 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on CBS Pittsburgh