Supreme Court's Voting Rights Act Ruling Empowers Southern Advocates.

Voting rights advocates and election attorneys are preparing for a new flood of redistricting litigation lawsuits challenging political maps, especially in the South, they say discriminate against minorities. The Supreme Court's decision in a major Alabama redistricting case has likely emboldened voting rights advocates to bring cases they previously thought would have been doomed. The ruling effectively maintained the status quo around how courts should approach Voting Rights Act lawsuits that allege a legislative map discriminates by race. There are 31 active federal cases involving Voting Rights Act redistricting claims similar to those in the Alabama case.
- Voting rights advocates in the South emboldened by Supreme Court win CNN
- Past voting rights cases show why Supreme Court Alabama ruling was a surprise The Washington Post
- Texas redistricting maps are in jeopardy and they should be. The Dallas Morning News
- Opinion | Alabama voting rights ruling might signal a Supreme Court shift The Washington Post
- Surprised by the Supreme Court's Voting Rights Act Ruling? Don't Be Bloomberg
Reading Insights
0
9
7 min
vs 8 min read
94%
1,548 → 97 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on CNN