Supreme Court Rulings and Controversies Surrounding Federal Grants and Judicial Disputes
TL;DR
The US Supreme Court has allowed the Trump administration to proceed with nearly $2 billion in NIH research grant cuts, ruling that lawsuits challenging the cuts should be reviewed by a contract-specialized court, but upheld the lower court's decision that the guidelines used for the cuts are illegal, effectively limiting researchers' ability to challenge such funding reductions in the future.
Topics:nationscience#legal-ruling#nih-grants#research-funding#science#supreme-court#trump-administration
- US Supreme Court allows NIH to cut $2 billion in research grants Nature
- Jackson scathing dissent levels partisan charge at colleagues after high-profile ruling Fox News
- Supreme Court gives Trump administration emergency relief in NIH grants appeal MSNBC News
- The Supreme Court hands down some incomprehensible gobbledygook about canceled federal grants yahoo.com
- Ketanji Brown Jackson Accuses Supreme Court of Lobbing 'Grenade' Newsweek
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on Nature