ArXiv tightens grip on AI-created references with year-long bans
TL;DR Summary
ArXiv will bar authors from posting for one year if a submission contains AI-generated hallucinated citations or other clear signs of unverified AI use, and authors must have work accepted at a reputable peer-reviewed venue before reposting. The policy aims to curb AI 'slop' in preprints but has sparked debate about whether bans address root causes, with supporters praising accountability and critics arguing for broader fixes and cross-platform cooperation.
Topics:technology#ai-hallucinations#arxiv#paper-mills#preprint-policy#scholarly-publishing#science-policy
- Researchers who use hallucinated references to face arXiv ban Nature
- 'AI Slop' Is Flooding Science Publishing, And One Major Site Is Fighting Back ScienceAlert
- ArXiv to Ban Researchers for a Year if They Submit AI Slop 404 Media
- A popular academic journal is coming down hard on AI-generated submissions Mashable
- Research repository ArXiv will ban authors for a year if they let AI do all the work TechCrunch
Reading Insights
Total Reads
1
Unique Readers
16
Time Saved
6 min
vs 7 min read
Condensed
94%
1,222 → 69 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Nature