Tag

Science Policy

All articles tagged with #science policy

science-and-society5 days ago•1 min saved

Nature's Interactive Quiz Highlights the Persistent Gender Gap in Science Nobels

Nature has launched an interactive quiz to test readers' knowledge of women who have won science Nobel Prizes, highlighting that women remain significantly underrepresented in physics, chemistry, and physiology or medicine despite recent efforts by awarding academies to diversify nomination pools. The quiz covers data up to 2025, noting that Marie Skłodowska-Curie is the only woman to have won two science Nobels, and asks users to identify the proportion of female winners in the last decade and the field with the highest number of female laureates. While the academies have acknowledged the disparity and adjusted procedures to improve diversity, men continue to dominate the 125-year history of the awards, with women comprising a small percentage of total recipients in these categories.

via Nature|

#diversity-in-stem #gender-equality #nobel-laureates

technology5 days ago•399 min saved

Kyoto Vision: 16 Nations Sign Pledge to Accelerate AI-Driven Science

The United States and 15 other countries are set to release a joint statement in Kyoto endorsing AI as a catalyst for a 'golden age of science.' The document, spearheaded by White House official Michael Kratsios, promotes the integration of 'super intelligence' and 'metascience' into research. While the initiative aims to democratize discovery through automated labs, it faces criticism for contradicting recent federal budget cuts to scientific agencies.

via NBC News|

#artificial-intelligence #international-relations #metascience

us-politics19 days ago•15 min saved

White House Moves to Screen NIH Grants via External Panel

Federal officials are drafting an executive order to place National Institutes of Health grant approvals under review by an outside panel that could veto awards not aligned with the Trump administration’s priorities. The plan, discussed at a contentious White House meeting, would broaden political control over NIH’s biomedical portfolio without rescinding existing funding, pitting OMB chief Russell Vought against NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya and drawing opposition from Congress and scientists who warn it threatens scientific autonomy.

via The New York Times|

#executive-order #nih #omb

science-policy2 months ago•8 min saved

Europe’s blueprint to become a bioengineering powerhouse: three bold changes

A Nature commentary argues Europe is losing ground in bioengineering to the US and China and calls for a European bioengineering agenda built on three pillars: (1) build academic excellence with dedicated bioengineering departments and cutting‑edge curricula; (2) invest in bioengineers via new, dedicated funding schemes and independent review panels; and (3) establish industry engagement, tax incentives, and streamlined regulatory pathways to translate research into market and clinical use, supported by upcoming EU funding programs to create homegrown hubs and attract global talent.

via Nature|

#bioengineering #education #europe

science-policy2 months ago•10 min saved

Fix the incentives to curb AI-driven fraud in scientific publishing

Generative AI accelerates the publish-or-perish pressure by enabling rapid fabrication of papers, with detectors often lagging behind increasingly convincing AI-made content. While disclosure norms and screening tools help, experts say the core fix is systemic: reward quality over quantity, adopt data attestations and provenance standards, and align funders, institutions, and publishers to slow AI-enabled fraud. Detection buys time, but meaningful reform requires changing the incentives that drive researchers to publish large volumes.

via C&EN|

#ai-in-science #paper-mills #peer-review

science-policy2 months ago•8 min saved

UK physics labs at a funding cliff: monetize research or face closure

UK physics facilities funded by STFC face a £42 million a year funding gap and risk closure unless they increasingly raise external income. A £135 million three‑year top‑up buys time to cut costs and grow commercial activity—such as paid beam time, technology licensing, and lab access—while beam time and jobs are set to shrink. The situation mirrors broader UK science funding reforms and lags behind some European labs in commercial income, leaving the sector at a crossroads about long‑term viability and the pace of change by 2030.

via Nature|

#commercial-revenue #diamond-light-source #lab-closures

technology2 months ago•13 min saved

White House's 'New Golden Age' for science sparks debate over funding and coherence

Ars Technica analyzes the White House OSTP report Science: A New Golden Age, which argues for streamlined grants, looser peer review, and closer ties between science and industry to accelerate science and AI innovation, but critics say the proposal is incoherent, ignores prior funding cuts, overstates its premises, and offers few clear mechanisms to move basic research into commercial advances.

via Ars Technica|

#innovation #ostp #research-funding

science-policy2 months ago•10 min saved

Translational foresight: planning science for multiple futures

The article argues that research programs should embed futures-thinking from the outset to avoid misalignment with future conditions. It promotes translational foresight—applying futures studies methods (like horizon scanning, the Futures Wheel, 2×2 scenario analysis, and backcasting Vision Writing) to funding, staffing, and infrastructure decisions. By explicitly uncovering and testing assumptions about technology maturation, public trust, and regulatory trajectories, and by planning trigger points for change, science can be better prepared for crises (e.g., COVID-19, AI advances) and for alternative futures. The piece calls for making these foresight practices routine in science policy and funding decisions to reduce reactive, crisis-driven shifts and improve long-term research outcomes.

via Nature|

#foresight #futures-studies #horizon-scanning

policy3 months ago•4 min saved

White House Plan Shifts Federal Grants From Merit to Policy Alignment, Sparking Scientist Backlash

The White House Office of Management and Budget proposed a sweeping rule to overhaul federal grantmaking by letting political appointees override merit reviews and require funding decisions to demonstrably advance the President’s priorities, with a 45-day public comment period ending July 13; critics warn the change could undermine scientific independence, limit international collaboration, and create instability for local infrastructure projects that rely on federal funding.

via Los Angeles Times|

#federal-grants #grantmaking #oversight

technology3 months ago•10 min saved

The AI-Driven Leap: Mass-Produced Science and the Scientist's New Role

AI could mass-produce high-quality science—new analyses, data, figures, and conclusions—at low cost, benefiting the public and patients, but it will also create challenges in separating quality work from low-quality output. Reliability will hinge on new practices like open data, preregistration, and robust validation. Humans will still guide which questions to pursue, refine concepts, design and interpret experiments, and curate trustworthy results. The shift may resemble the Industrial Revolution: some jobs vanish while new roles emerge, with AI-enabled data integration and personalized review accelerating discoveries while reshaping careers in science.

via The Transmitter|

#artificial-intelligence #data-science #neuroscience

world3 months ago•6 min saved

China rethinks overseas science publishing amid security worries

Beijing is weighing reforms to reduce the weight of publishing in international journals (SCI-indexed) in academic promotions to address national-security concerns about leaks, potentially boosting Chinese journals and tightening oversight of cross-border scientific exchange amid rising US-China tensions.

via Financial Times|

#china #international-journals #national-security

science-policy3 months ago•7 min saved

China expands NSFC grants for early-career scientists, adding 12,000 projects

China's main research funder, the NSFC, will fund an extra 12,000 projects for its Young Scientists Fund this year, boosting the budget by about 3.6 billion yuan (US$531 million) and aiming to ease intense competition for entry-level researchers, though experts caution that the expansion may not fully resolve job security or tenure pressures.

via Nature|

#china #early-career #nsfc

science-policy3 months ago•6 min saved

Acknowledge bias: scientists urged to own politics to boost public trust

UK data show trust in science remains relatively high but fragile and uneven across ideological groups; perceived bias—often linked to COVID-19—can erode confidence. The author argues scientists should recognise their own political biases and follow six public‑facing practices to put people at the heart of science and policy, thereby sustaining trust in science.

via Nature|

#policy #political-bias #public-trust

science-policy3 months ago•8 min saved

Trust in Science Isn’t Crumbling—Time to Fix the Gaps

The piece argues that trust in science is not collapsing globally; surveys show middling to high trust, but confidence varies by country and group, with political polarization, perceived elitism, and rising vaccine hesitancy. It urges nuanced measures of trust, transparent communication about uncertainties, and greater public involvement in research priorities to address concerns and strengthen science’s link to society.

via Nature|

#policy-and-funding #public-engagement #science-communication

policy3 months ago•13 min saved

Public in the Lead: Six Paths to Democratic Science Policy

Nature argues that trust in elites is waning and public input should be embedded in research and policymaking through six steps: involve the public in research, make science advisory bodies participatory, embrace diverse knowledge (including Indigenous and community expertise), be humble and transparent about methods and uncertainties, acknowledge scientists’ values, and enable co-design with communities—citing EU Horizon 2020 priority setting, citizen panels influencing Danish and NASA decisions, and community-led mangrove restoration as evidence that public involvement boosts legitimacy and policy relevance.

via Nature|

#co-production #policy #public-participation