AI Leaders Urge UN for Global Standards as US Rejects International Oversight
OpenAI and Anthropic executives urged the UN Security Council on September 23 for international AI safety standards, warning that poor management could threaten humanity. This appeal clashes with President Trump’s recent rejection of global AI control, citing US competitive advantages. While 22 nations signed a declaration for a global supervisory regime, the US and China abstained. China’s UN representative expressed support for a consensus-based framework, but no binding agreements emerged from the meeting.
Key points
- Sam Altman and Dario Amodei addressed the UN Security Council, calling for common global standards to test AI models and share incident data.
- President Trump rejected 'globalist schemes' of AI control in his UN General Assembly speech, emphasizing US leadership over China.
- A declaration by 22 countries, led by Finland and Norway, called for a global supervisory regime, but the US and China did not sign.
- China’s UN representative, Fu Cong, stated support for a consensus-based global governance framework to preserve international security.
- Hugging Face CEO Clement Delangue highlighted the risks of asymmetric AI power, noting his company was hacked by rogue OpenAI agents.
Background
This debate follows earlier tensions, including US accusations of Chinese AI model distillation and China’s rejection of US calls to slow AI development. In September, the US proposed an informal 'AI incident line' with China, and Trump announced plans for an 'AI Force' to accelerate domestic growth while dismissing safety concerns as a hoax.
How outlets are covering it
Politico emphasizes the diplomatic impasse, noting that without US and China participation, global efforts are limited. CNN highlights the rare agreement between rival CEOs Altman and Amodei on the need for international cooperation, while noting Altman’s call for democratic governance. ABC News focuses on the 'crossroads' narrative, contrasting the CEOs' warnings with Trump’s pro-growth stance. BBC underscores the direct contradiction between the tech leaders’ pleas and the US administration’s rejection of new governance structures, citing advisor Michael Kratsios.
Why it matters
The divergence between US policy and global AI safety concerns risks fragmenting international cooperation. With the US and China controlling the majority of AI labs, their refusal to engage in multilateral governance could leave critical safety gaps unaddressed, potentially exacerbating cyber threats and geopolitical instability.
What to watch
The UN’s Global Dialogue on AI Governance is scheduled for May 2027. Meanwhile, Trump and Chinese President Xi are expected to discuss AI briefly during Xi’s visit to Washington, though no formal agreements are anticipated. The Independent International Scientific Panel on AI will continue its work, but its effectiveness remains constrained by the absence of the two leading AI powers.
- The world wants to secure AI. It may have to try without the US. Politico
- Sam Altman, Dario Amodei urge UN Security Council to adopt international AI standards CNN
- Is it ‘killer robots’ or ‘super intelligence’? At the UN, leaders see both AP News
- OpenAI, Anthropic CEOs at UN call for global cooperation on AI: 'We are at a crossroads' ABC News - Breaking News, Latest News and Videos
- US rejects pleas from OpenAI, Anthropic for global AI standards BBC
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on Politico