Tag

Courts And Law

All articles tagged with #courts and law

Supreme Court keeps Herridge’s source-privacy fight alive with $800-a-day sanctions
courts-and-law8 days ago

Supreme Court keeps Herridge’s source-privacy fight alive with $800-a-day sanctions

The Supreme Court declined to grant an emergency stay, leaving in place a lower-court order that former Fox News reporter Catherine Herridge must disclose a confidential source or face $800 per day in sanctions for refusing to identify the source in a federal privacy dispute involving Yanping Chen. Justice Brett Kavanaugh said he would have granted the stay, but the unsigned order let the sanctions stand while the case proceeds. Press-freedom advocates warn the ruling jeopardizes journalistic confidentiality and the free flow of information, while Herridge and Fox News indicated they may pursue further legal options.

Ex-Olympian indicted over Reflecting Pool vandalism at Lincoln Memorial
courts-and-law8 days ago

Ex-Olympian indicted over Reflecting Pool vandalism at Lincoln Memorial

A Washington grand jury indicted former Olympic canoeist David Hearn, 67, on a felony destruction of property charge for allegedly trying to remove sealant from the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool during its June refurbishment; the incident is said to have occurred June 19, carrying a potential sentence of up to 10 years in prison, though Hearn says he was wrongly arrested and that a detached pool liner prompted his actions.

Trans rights advocates weigh limits of Supreme Court litigation
courts-and-law9 days ago

Trans rights advocates weigh limits of Supreme Court litigation

After the Supreme Court’s rulings upholding state bans on transgender athletes and related decisions on transition care and parental notification, LGBTQ+ advocates are debating whether every case should go to the Court, warning that pressing high-profile cases on a conservative bench could yield sweeping precedents that undermine the movement even as transgender rights face a year of setbacks.

Five Courtroom Shifts Reshape Power, Elections and LGBTQ Rights
courts-and-law10 days ago

Five Courtroom Shifts Reshape Power, Elections and LGBTQ Rights

The latest Supreme Court term expanded presidential power over federal agencies and upheld several Trump policy moves, while weakening civil-rights protections—most notably by narrowing voting rights—along with rulings on birthright citizenship and LGBTQ rights, signaling a major shift with potential election and minority-protection implications.

Supreme Court widens gun rights, striking Hawaii’s public-carry limits
courts-and-law15 days ago

Supreme Court widens gun rights, striking Hawaii’s public-carry limits

In a 6-3 ruling, the Supreme Court struck down Hawaii’s public-carry restrictions, saying they violated the Second Amendment and signaling a Bruen-era expansion of gun rights. The decision adds to a string of rulings loosening firearm regulations and could influence carry rules in other states, continuing ongoing debates over gun policy.

Judge halts key provisions of Trump’s mail-ballot order
courts-and-law15 days ago

Judge halts key provisions of Trump’s mail-ballot order

A federal judge blocked key provisions of President Trump’s executive order aimed at restricting mail ballots, ruling the president lacks authority to limit who can receive them. The decision comes a month after another judge had allowed parts of the order to stand, and the case remains tied up in ongoing litigation, including actions in Washington, D.C.

Supreme Court narrows Rastafarian’s ability to sue over forced dreadlocks
courts-and-law17 days ago

Supreme Court narrows Rastafarian’s ability to sue over forced dreadlocks

The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that Damon Landor, a Rastafarian inmate, cannot sue Louisiana prison officials in federal court for forcibly shaving his dreadlocks in violation of a court order; the decision, grounded in procedural legal tech­niques, marks a departure from recent expansions of religious freedoms and leaves Landor’s related state-law claims intact.

Supreme Court reinstates decades‑old Etan Patz murder conviction
courts-and-law18 days ago

Supreme Court reinstates decades‑old Etan Patz murder conviction

The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, reinstated Pedro Hernandez’s conviction for the 1979 kidnapping and murder of 6-year-old Etan Patz, ruling the Second Circuit erred in overturning the verdict; Hernandez had confessed multiple times, though he later argued those statements were obtained improperly, a ruling that preserves a decades-long high-profile case.