Supreme Court Considers Modern Stalking Laws in Colorado Case.

TL;DR Summary
The US Supreme Court is considering when statements, particularly those made online, can be considered "true threats" not protected by the First Amendment. The case involves a Colorado law used to convict Billy Raymond Counterman of stalking and causing "emotional distress" for Coles Whalen, a singer-songwriter he had never met. Counterman contends the state must show that the speaker intends the messages to be threatening. Colorado, backed by the Justice Department and a majority of states, says it should be enough that a "reasonable" recipient feel the threat of physical harm could be imminent, based on the context of the circumstances.
- Online threats, stalking debated by Supreme Court in Colorado case The Washington Post
- Supreme Court hears a case about whether the intention behind threats matters NPR
- SCOTUS hears challenge to Colorado stalking law, with questions about modern 'sensitivity' 9News.com KUSA
- Supreme Court takes up Colorado stalking case FOX 31 Denver
- In social media stalking case, Supreme Court considers scope of ‘true threat’ The Hill
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
12
Time Saved
5 min
vs 6 min read
Condensed
91%
1,135 → 101 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The Washington Post