Bulkhead CEO Clarifies Hiring Practices After Wardogs Crunch Controversy

Bulkhead CEO Joe Brammer issued a statement to Eurogamer following backlash over his comments that the studio screens candidates' social media for anti-crunch messaging. Brammer clarified that his remarks were informal and that any screening complies with UK law. He detailed a specific instance of optional crunch for the Wardogs beta, noting that four staff members opted out without penalty. The studio defends its culture by highlighting financial bonuses and equity for employees, despite ongoing debates about the ethics of linking career success to overtime tolerance.
Key points
- Brammer stated that his comments about checking social media were informal and not a formal recruitment policy, asserting compliance with UK data protection laws.
- The studio admitted to a 16-day crunch period in June 2026 for the Wardogs beta, adding two hours per day, which was optional for staff.
- Brammer emphasized that employees who own shares receive significant bonuses, aiming to make hard work financially rewarding.
- The controversy highlights tensions between studio transparency and industry norms regarding mandatory overtime and candidate vetting.
Background
This incident follows earlier reports in September 2026 that Bulkhead, the developer of the successful FPS Wardogs, had a culture of crunch. Previous coverage noted that while the studio offered perks like a four-day workweek and equity, it also faced criticism for vetting applicants based on their public stance against overtime. Wardogs sold two million copies in its first five days, leading to discussions about the financial rewards for staff who endured intense work periods.
How outlets are covering it
Eurogamer and Game Developer focused on Brammer's clarification that social media screening is informal and legally compliant, while also detailing the optional nature of the June crunch. Aftermath provided a critical perspective, arguing that linking career success to silence on crunch fosters unhealthy environments, regardless of financial incentives. All sources agreed that Brammer's comments sparked significant debate regarding the ethics of hiring practices in the games industry.
Why it matters
The controversy underscores ongoing debates in the games industry about the normalization of crunch and the legality of screening candidates based on their public opinions. It highlights the tension between studio cultures that prioritize hard work and employee rights to criticize working conditions, potentially influencing future hiring practices and labor regulations in the UK.
What to watch
Bulkhead may face further scrutiny regarding its recruitment practices and labor policies. The studio might need to adjust its public communications to avoid similar backlash, while the industry may see increased discussion about the ethics of vetting candidates based on their stance on crunch.
- "I apologised" - Wardogs studio CEO issues new response to backlash after saying his studio won't hire people who "constantly tweet anti-crunch messaging" Eurogamer.net
- Wardogs CEO says he won't hire devs who aren't down with mandatory crunch: 'If you care about what you're making, this is the place to work' Yahoo
- Wardogs lead says the studio won't hire people who decry crunch on social media Game Developer
- Wardogs CEO Says Workers Who Speak Out Against Crunch Won't 'Be Happy Here' Aftermath
- 'They Often Don't Make It in the Door' — Wardogs CEO Hesitant to Hire Employees That Speak Out Against Crunch IGN
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on Eurogamer.net