US-Venezuela Oil Pact: 100-Year Lease, 65 Billion Barrels, and a Colonialism Debate

3 min read
Source: Al Jazeera
US-Venezuela Oil Pact: 100-Year Lease, 65 Billion Barrels, and a Colonialism Debate
Photo: Al Jazeera
TL;DR

The US and Venezuela have agreed to a 100-year deal granting Washington majority control over 65 billion barrels of Venezuelan oil. While the Trump administration frames this as a historic energy victory that will lower gas prices and boost the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve, critics and analysts argue the arrangement resembles colonial exploitation and lacks clear legal or economic terms.

Key points

  • The deal grants the US majority control over 65 billion barrels of proven oil reserves, roughly 20% of Venezuela's total, for a period of 100 years.
  • The agreement involves 17 strategic oil fields and will be executed through a partnership between the US government and a private business entity.
  • Venezuela's interim President Delcy Rodriguez estimates the deal will generate $209 billion in tax revenue and $100 billion in private investment for the country.
  • The US Strategic Petroleum Reserve is currently at 289.7 million barrels, far below its 714 million barrel capacity, prompting the administration to seek new supply sources.
  • The deal was announced on Friday, coinciding with the six-month anniversary of the US-Israel war on Iran, which has kept the Strait of Hormuz closed and spiked global oil prices.

Background

This development follows the January 3, 2026, US military operation that removed Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, who is now awaiting trial in New York. His successor, Delcy Rodriguez, has been under pressure from the Trump administration to align with US demands. Previous coverage from August 2026 highlighted that while the deal was announced, specific terms remained undisclosed, and oil executives expressed caution regarding Venezuela's aging infrastructure and political risks.

How outlets are covering it

The Trump administration and Secretary of State Marco Rubio frame the deal as a mutual benefit that will lower US gas prices and aid Venezuela's economic reconstruction. In contrast, The New York Times reports that many Venezuelans view the arrangement as a new form of colonialism that strikes at national identity. Al Jazeera notes that while Trump claims the deal 'more than doubles' US oil reserves, analysts like Rory Johnston argue the 65-billion-barrel figure is a 'red herring' with little relevance to actual deals, as the terms remain unknown. CNN suggests the deal could benefit both nations but emphasizes that the process will take time. Critics, including energy analyst Gregory Brew, compare the move to British imperial oil concessions, while international law experts argue that countries have permanent sovereignty over their resources.

Why it matters

The deal represents a significant shift in US foreign policy, asserting dominance in the Western Hemisphere through resource control. It directly impacts global oil markets by potentially increasing US supply, which could influence gas prices ahead of the November midterm elections. Furthermore, it sets a precedent for how the US may approach other resource-rich nations, such as Iran, raising questions about the future of international law and sovereignty in the 21st century.

What to watch

The next steps involve the finalization of the deal's specific terms, which remain largely undisclosed. The US government will partner with a private business to begin extraction, while Venezuela will likely see an influx of private investment aimed at reconstructing its hydrocarbon infrastructure. The impact on global oil prices and the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve will be monitored closely, as will the reaction from other nations and international legal bodies.

Share this article

Want the full story? Read the original reporting

Read on Al Jazeera