NATO's Proximity Deterrence: Countering Russian Aggression

Former NATO deputy head, Rose Gottemoeller, argues that while traditional deterrence failed to prevent Russia's invasion of Ukraine, a more nuanced form of deterrence called "proximity deterrence" is currently in effect. This strategy relies on the proximity of Ukrainian facilities to NATO territory, which discourages massive Russian missile strikes. NATO's air-policing of Black Sea transit lanes and its commitment to defending every inch of alliance territory, including Romanian territory across the Danube from Ukrainian ports, reinforce this deterrence. However, the situation remains volatile, and NATO must continue to bolster proximity deterrence to prevent attacks from straying onto its territory and escalating into direct confrontation.
- Russian attacks would be far worse without NATO's “proximity” deterrence, argues Rose Gottemoeller The Economist
- Gravitas: NATO bolsters baltic defences amid Russia threat WION
- NATO must respond to Russia's provocations in Belarus Atlantic Council
- Nothing Seems to Deter Russian Aggression Like NATO Membership Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- The Baltic response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine The Interpreter
- View Full Coverage on Google News
Reading Insights
0
11
4 min
vs 5 min read
88%
895 → 104 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The Economist