All articles tagged with #mail in voting
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented as the Supreme Court stayed parts of President Trump's mail-in voting order, warning the majority’s approach could inject chaos into the upcoming midterms by letting challenges unfold at unstable times and leaving states in legal limbo, while noting the court did not decide the order’s ultimate legality.
The administration’s proposed rule would require USPS to vet outgoing mail-ballot envelopes for federal compliance and use a new Federal Ballot Mail Portal to submit voter data, pressuring states to adopt a top-down federal system ahead of the 2026 midterms. Following a Supreme Court ruling on standing in a related citizenship-list case, lawsuits to block the rules continue, with officials warning compliance could be impractical in some jurisdictions and voting-rights groups warning of reduced ballot access for seniors, the disabled, rural residents, students, and workers. The situation remains unresolved as further injunctions and rulings loom.
The Supreme Court granted a stay and allowed the Trump administration to begin enforcing an executive order aimed at overhauling mail-in voting by creating citizenship lists and directing USPS to deliver ballots only to verified voters, despite lower-court blocks. The decision centers on jurisdiction and potential harm to the executive branch, with dissents warning that election challenges can come too late or too early and cautioning against expanding presidential overreach into election administration.
The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 ruling, allowed federal agencies to proceed with parts of President Trump’s plan to regulate mail ballots (including lists of eligible voters and tighter processing) while leaving the merits of the rules to be decided in future litigation; California and other states vow to sue to block implementation before the November election, and the ruling does not compel states to use the Homeland Security lists or finalize the legality of the changes.
The Supreme Court, in an unsigned emergency order, lets the Trump administration press ahead with its plan to restrict mail-in voting by directing the USPS to decide who gets ballots and by creating citizenship lists, despite ongoing lower-court injunctions; the ruling is temporary and not a final decision, with more legal battles likely as the midterms approach and early voting begins.
Sen. Susan Collins declines to join VP JD Vance during his Maine stop, citing a scheduling conflict, as she opposes Trump's 50% tariffs on Canada and new USPS rules that could restrict mail-in voting, signaling an independent stance in a key Senate race.
The USPS plans to publish a final rule that would force states to share voter lists with federal agencies and adopt stricter mail-ballot procedures, including a Federal Ballot Mail Portal to verify ballots, with the agency saying it would stop delivering ballots if states don’t comply. Two federal injunctions in California and Massachusetts currently block the changes, even as the administration has sued about 30 states for withholding voter data. The rule ties to a March executive order aimed at restricting mail voting, and officials say changes could take effect if injunctions are lifted. Public comments on the proposal exceeded 200,000, and Trump has publicly supported tighter mail-voting rules while himself voting by mail in a Florida primary this year.
President Trump voted by mail in Florida’s primary for the second time this year while lobbying Congress to pass the SAVE America Act, which would impose stricter mail-in voting rules and require voter ID, despite his long-standing criticisms of mail-in voting.
President Donald Trump voted by mail in Florida's Republican primary, with Palm Beach County records showing a ballot request in late July and return on Aug. 13, continuing his pattern of voting by mail in his adopted home state. He had previously voted by mail in a Palm Beach County special election this year. Florida allows universal mail voting with ID and renewal requirements, and the primary features a crowded field including Trump-endorsed Byron Donalds. The piece sits amid ongoing national debates over mail voting and related court actions, as the administration advocates for or against voting reforms.
Trump’s administration asked the Supreme Court to pause a lower-court ruling and let sweeping mail-in voting restrictions tied to an executive order proceed before the November midterms. The plan would have federal agencies help create voter lists and require the USPS to deliver ballots only to those on the lists; a district court blocked the order for overstepping presidential authority, and the First Circuit did not pause that ruling, prompting an emergency appeal to the Supreme Court to act quickly so the policy would be in place by August. Voting-rights advocates warn the restrictions could disproportionately affect Democratic voters, while Trump has claimed voter fraud remains a concern.
The Justice Department asked the Supreme Court to allow President Trump’s March executive order creating a federal list of eligible voters and directing USPS to send ballots only to people on that list, arguing it should proceed while lawsuits unfold. Democratic officials warn the president lacks authority to rewrite election rules and fear potential abuse, while opponents have blocked the measure in multiple states ahead of elections. A Massachusetts judge halted it for the November vote, and a First Circuit panel upheld that halt, with the plan involving USCIS and the SSA compiling the list.
The Trump administration filed a request with the Supreme Court seeking to allow a lower-court order that targets or restricts mail-in voting to remain in effect before the upcoming midterm elections, underscoring ongoing legal battles over voting procedures and federal versus state control as the court weighs its next move.
A federal appeals court refused to pause a district court injunction blocking key parts of Trump’s March executive order to tighten mail-in voting across 23 states, ruling that states must respond to the order now as deadlines approach; the court also found DHS and USPS lack clear statutory authority to impose binding voter lists or mail-in voting rules.
A federal appeals court (the 1st U.S. Circuit) refused to lift an injunction blocking key parts of Trump’s March executive order to tighten mail-in voting in 23 states, saying states must respond now to looming deadlines as federal agencies prepare new rules. The lower court had found aspects of the order unconstitutional, and the DOJ sought a brief stay pending appeal; the ruling keeps the injunction in place while the case advances.
A DC Circuit panel temporarily lifted a lower-court injunction, letting USPS press ahead with a Trump-backed mail-ballot rule that would require states to share voter data to determine ballot transmission; the ruling gives USPS time to finalize the rule while the NAACP-led challenge proceeds, but it does not decide the rule’s ultimate legality and notes the need to act before the 2026 election.