All articles tagged with #federal grants
A California federal judge granted a preliminary injunction blocking the Trump administration from imposing anti-DEI conditions on federal grants to 11 California and Oregon cities and counties, saying the policy exceeds Congress’s spending powers and contradicts grant purposes; other courts have issued similar blocks in related cases.
The White House Office of Management and Budget proposed a sweeping rule to overhaul federal grantmaking by letting political appointees override merit reviews and require funding decisions to demonstrably advance the President’s priorities, with a 45-day public comment period ending July 13; critics warn the change could undermine scientific independence, limit international collaboration, and create instability for local infrastructure projects that rely on federal funding.
The Trump administration unveiled a 400+ page proposal to overhaul federal grantmaking, aiming to codify tighter political control over federally funded research by reducing emphasis on peer review, restricting how grant funds can be used for publishing or conference travel, and granting political appointees broader power to terminate grants; if formalized, the rules would apply government-wide.
The Department of Health and Human Services has abruptly terminated millions of dollars in grants to the American Academy of Pediatrics, citing issues like language use and misalignment with priorities, amid ongoing conflicts over vaccine policies and criticisms of RFK Jr. The move impacts vital child health initiatives and follows the AAP's criticism of Kennedy's vaccine policy changes.
Harvard received $46 million in federal research grants from NIH after a court ruling struck down a Trump-era funding freeze, marking the first disbursement since May, though long-term financial challenges remain due to potential budget cuts and increased taxes.
Following a court ruling that declared a federal funding blockade illegal, the Trump administration has begun restoring some research grants to Harvard University, though the broader conflict over funding remains unresolved and subject to appeal and further legal action.
The article discusses concerns about the Supreme Court's perceived bias in favor of Donald Trump, highlighted by Justice Jackson's criticism of a recent decision and the broader implication of partisan influence within the Court.
President Trump has issued a memorandum directing the Attorney General to investigate the misuse of federal grant funds for illegal lobbying and partisan political activities, emphasizing legal compliance and reporting within 180 days.
The Supreme Court issued a complex and confusing ruling on the Trump administration's cancellation of NIH public health grants, which involved research on critical health issues and was challenged in court for being arbitrary and lacking clear guidance, with Justice Jackson criticizing the decision as 'Calvinball jurisprudence' that favors the administration.
The White House responded assertively to California Governor Gavin Newsom's opposition to federal grant cuts at UCLA, which are linked to allegations of antisemitism and civil rights violations. Newsom threatened to sue the Trump administration over the over $1 billion in federal funding being withheld, citing political motives. The situation involves complex legal and political tensions, with UCLA's research funding and civil rights issues at the center of the dispute.
Florida's universities are facing significant research funding cuts and audits under Governor DeSantis, aligned with federal efforts led by the Trump administration to restrict research topics and terminate grants, impacting ongoing projects and academic freedom across the state.
The order aims to reform federal grantmaking by enhancing oversight, ensuring grants align with national interests, reducing waste, and preventing funding of activities that conflict with American values or safety, with a focus on transparency, accountability, and strategic allocation of taxpayer dollars.
The Trump administration has suspended $584 million in federal grants for UCLA over allegations of civil rights violations related to antisemitism and affirmative action, marking the first time a public university has faced such targeted funding cuts, which UCLA warns could be devastating for research and innovation.
The Trump administration has suspended $584 million in federal grants to UCLA over allegations related to antisemitism and civil rights violations, threatening vital research funding and prompting university and political leaders to oppose the move, which they argue ignores UCLA's efforts to combat antisemitism and support campus safety.
UCLA is negotiating with the federal government over a $339 million grant freeze, the first public university targeted by Trump, amid accusations of allowing antisemitism and other issues. The university is exploring options including negotiations, lawsuits, and using reserves, while faculty and legal actions challenge the legitimacy of the grant suspensions. The situation raises concerns about the impact on research and university autonomy.