All articles tagged with #israeli occupation
Israel’s defence minister said the army will occupy southern Lebanon up to the Litani River to form a defensive buffer, a move Hezbollah vowed to resist as cross-border strikes and demolitions intensify; the Lebanon conflict has killed over 1,000 people and displaced more than a million.
The Nassar family in the West Bank has fought a decades-long legal battle to retain their ancestral farm, which is threatened by Israeli efforts to declare it state land and by settler violence, highlighting the broader struggle of Palestinians to preserve their land under occupation.
Christmas celebrations returned to Bethlehem after two years, but festivities were limited due to Israeli military checkpoints and ongoing violence in the West Bank, where record demolitions, displacement, and settlement expansion continue amidst a backdrop of conflict and political tension.
Christians in Bethlehem face severe challenges due to Israeli occupation, economic decline, land seizures, and violence, leading to a significant decline in Christian population and cultural heritage, with many leaving the Holy Land.
A UN report by Francesca Albanese exposes how various international corporations, financial institutions, and academic entities profit from and enable Israel's occupation and genocide of Palestinians, calling for global accountability, sanctions, and civil society action to end these crimes.
After calling out Israeli "apartheid" during an award speech at the Berlin Film Festival, the co-director of a documentary about the Israeli occupation of the West Bank, Basel Adra, and his co-director Yuval Abraham, faced threats and a visit from a right-wing Israeli mob at Abraham's family home. The remarks sparked a furious reaction, with German authorities investigating the speeches and Israeli media labeling them as antisemitic. The directors' colleagues and regional publications have stood in support, denouncing the campaign against them and highlighting the growing intolerance for hearing hard truths about Israeli apartheid.
The International Court of Justice hearings on the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories concluded with only the US, UK, Hungary, and Fiji defending Israel's practices, while 45 countries and three organizations testified against it. Legal experts and representatives from various nations presented evidence against the occupation, arguing that it is unlawful and must end, despite the US and UK's claims that it is merely a "dispute" between the two sides. The hearings took place amid Israel's ongoing bombardment of Gaza and plans to build new settlements in the West Bank, with the US framing compliance with international law as an impediment to the political process.
The International Court of Justice is hearing final arguments in a case challenging Israel's occupation of the Palestinian territories, initiated by a UN General Assembly resolution. The case questions the legal consequences of Israel's 56-year occupation, with the Palestinian Authority accusing Israel of colonialism and apartheid. The proceedings could have significant implications, potentially affecting trade and the legitimacy of Israel's position, and may serve as a catalyst for negotiations. The ICJ's opinion, if issued, could instruct UN bodies and nations to do nothing to support the current situation, potentially impacting countries' support for Israel.
Arab states and Turkey have urged the International Court of Justice to declare the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories illegal, with Turkey describing it as the "real obstacle to peace." The court has been hearing arguments from over 50 states following a request by the U.N. General Assembly, and is expected to issue a non-binding opinion on the occupation. Israel, not participating in the hearings, has expressed concerns about the court's involvement, while the United States has urged the court to limit its advisory opinion. The court is expected to take roughly six months to issue its decision.
Qatar condemns "double standards" at the International Court of Justice hearing on Israel's occupation of the Palestinian territories, emphasizing that international law must apply to all countries. Representatives from various countries, including South Africa, Pakistan, Norway, Indonesia, and the United Kingdom, also express concerns about Israel's policies, with some referring to it as an "apartheid regime." The hearings aim to address the legal implications of Israel's occupation, settlement, and annexation, with the Palestinian officials seeking international legal institutions to investigate Israel's occupation, especially in light of the current war in Gaza.
Over 50 countries are testifying against Israel's occupation of the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and Gaza at the International Court of Justice, marking the largest-ever participation in the court's history. The Palestinian Foreign Minister and envoy to the U.N. delivered emotional testimonies, urging the court to guide the international community in upholding international law and achieving a just and lasting peace. The case argues that Israel's occupation violates international law, including the acquisition of territory by force, violations of Palestinian self-determination, and the imposition of a regime of racial discrimination and demographic manipulation. The court's decision is expected to have significant implications for Israel's policies and its allies, including the U.S.
The International Court of Justice is hearing oral arguments over the Israeli occupation of Palestinian-claimed land, following a request for an advisory opinion by the UN General Assembly. The case focuses on the legal consequences of Israel's violation of the Palestinian people's right to self-determination and prolonged occupation, settlement, and annexation of Palestinian territory since 1967. The court's ruling, expected in months, will be advisory. This case is separate from previous proceedings regarding accusations of genocide in Israel's war against Hamas. Palestinian Authority Foreign Minister emphasized that their people are determined to stay and live in freedom and dignity in their ancestral land.
The top U.N. court is set to hold public hearings on the legality of Israel's occupation of Palestinian territory, with the focus on the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and Gaza. The U.S., Egypt, Russia, France, and China are among the countries participating, while Israel will not attend. The U.N. Security Council is expected to vote on a resolution for an immediate cease-fire in Gaza, and Israel's government has approved a declaration refusing to recognize a Palestinian state. Meanwhile, Norway will help transfer frozen funds to the Palestinian Authority, and the largest medical facility in southern Gaza is no longer functional after Israeli raids.
The International Court of Justice is holding hearings on the legal consequences of Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories, with over 50 states set to address the judges. This comes after the U.N. General Assembly requested an advisory opinion on the occupation. The hearings are part of a Palestinian effort to have international legal institutions examine Israel's conduct, particularly in light of recent events in Gaza. The outcome will not be legally binding but could carry significant moral authority.
The U.S. proposal to return postwar administrative and security control of Gaza to the Palestinian Authority (PA) has been met with skepticism by Palestinians, who view the PA as an illegitimate subcontractor for Israel's occupation. The PA's security coordination with Israel and its repression of Palestinian dissent have eroded its legitimacy, leading to widespread disillusionment among Palestinians. Human rights advocates caution that American support for PA forces has enabled a culture of impunity, while some PA security forces acknowledge the contradiction of their role in maintaining order in the West Bank.