Automotive Technology News

The latest automotive technology stories, summarized by AI

Hyundai signals bolder N EVs with more immersive tech and a new platform
automotive-technology5.125 min read

Hyundai signals bolder N EVs with more immersive tech and a new platform

2 months agoSource: Electrek
View original source
Toyota Unveils Versatile Compact Engines for Multiple Fuels
automotive-technology
2.68 min2 years ago

Toyota Unveils Versatile Compact Engines for Multiple Fuels

Toyota showcased new compact engines that can run on various fuels, including biofuels and e-fuels, aiming to meet tougher emissions standards. The engines, developed in collaboration with Subaru and Mazda, are designed to integrate with electric drive units and offer significant size and weight reductions. This move aligns with Toyota's strategy of promoting multiple powertrain options, including hybrids, amid a slowdown in EV growth.

More Automotive Technology Stories

"Revealing Tesla Autopilot Flaws Through Depositions"
automotive-technology2 years ago

"Revealing Tesla Autopilot Flaws Through Depositions"

In a wrongful-death lawsuit involving a fatal 2018 crash, a Tesla engineer revealed that the company's Autopilot system is designed to follow painted lane lines and is not equipped to handle roads with poor or faded markings. The crash, which resulted in the death of the driver, has raised concerns about the system's limitations and the company's marketing of the technology. The lawsuit sheds light on Tesla's design decisions, including its reliance on cameras and lack of redundancy compared to other autonomous vehicle systems. The case also highlights the ongoing debate about driver responsibility and the effectiveness of driver-assistance systems like Autopilot.

"Tesla's Transition to FSD (Supervised) and Free Autopilot Access: What You Need to Know"
automotive-technology2 years ago

"Tesla's Transition to FSD (Supervised) and Free Autopilot Access: What You Need to Know"

Tesla has officially replaced the "FSD Beta" program with "FSD (Supervised)" in its 2024.3.10 Release Notes, indicating a shift in confidence in its Full Self-Driving suite. The updated terminology emphasizes the need for driver supervision while highlighting the system's capabilities, with positive feedback from users. Tesla is actively promoting FSD (Supervised) to new and existing customers, offering test rides and a one-month free trial in the US and Canada.

"SnappOS Introduces Sleek UI Theming for Android Automotive"
automotive-technology2 years ago

"SnappOS Introduces Sleek UI Theming for Android Automotive"

Snapp Automotive introduces "SnappOS," a customized take on Android Automotive with a "Dynamic Theming" engine built with JetPack Compose, allowing for in-depth and impressive themes to be created and changed on the fly. The theming can be adjusted from a user's phone without disrupting the in-car UI, and can also adapt based on the car's activity. SnappOS aims to accelerate the adoption of Android Automotive for carmakers and third-party hardware producers, while still integrating with Google's services.

"Tesla's Mandatory FSD Test Drive for US Buyers Sparks Stock Rally"
automotive-technology2 years ago

"Tesla's Mandatory FSD Test Drive for US Buyers Sparks Stock Rally"

Tesla CEO Elon Musk announced that the company will offer U.S. customers a one-month free trial of its Full Self-Driving (FSD) technology, priced at $12,000, in an effort to boost sales amid softening demand and price competition. Musk instructed Tesla staff to provide FSD demonstrations to new buyers and owners of serviced vehicles, as the "FSD take rate" has declined in North America. The FSD software, which requires active driver supervision, has also been offered as a subscription for $199 a month.

"Chinese EVs Integrate Camera Drones for Advanced Surveillance"
automotive-technology2 years ago

"Chinese EVs Integrate Camera Drones for Advanced Surveillance"

Chinese automakers are integrating camera drones into electric vehicles, targeting content creators who want to capture videos while driving. BYD, Lynk & Co, and Dongfeng have incorporated drones into their SUVs, allowing for one-click filming and live viewing on the car's display. The drones can be voice-controlled and have features like motion detection and face recognition. Shanghai-based automotive journalist Mark Rainford predicts more Chinese automakers will follow suit, despite potential limitations such as obstacle avoidance and speed restrictions. DJI's obstacle-avoidance technology is also being integrated into cars, with the company aiming to sell its Lingxi autonomous driving technology to automakers.

"Prominent Safety Group Gives Poor Ratings to 14 Partial Automated Driving Systems"
automotive-technology2 years ago

"Prominent Safety Group Gives Poor Ratings to 14 Partial Automated Driving Systems"

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) tested 14 partial automated driving systems and found that none earned a "good" rating, with only one rated as acceptable and two as marginal. Systems from BMW, Ford, General Motors, Genesis, Lexus, Mercedes-Benz, Nissan, Tesla, and Volvo were evaluated, with Tesla's Full Self-Driving (Beta) Version 2023.7.10 receiving the worst rating. IIHS conducted tests involving covering the driver's face and attaching weights to the steering wheel to simulate a driver's hands, revealing concerning results but also suggesting that fixes may be readily available through software updates.

"IIHS Study Reveals Widespread Failures in Automaker ADAS Safeguards"
automotive-technology2 years ago

"IIHS Study Reveals Widespread Failures in Automaker ADAS Safeguards"

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) has found that most partially automated Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) from various automakers, including Tesla, Ford, and Nissan, received "marginal" or "poor" ratings in a recent study. The study evaluated 14 systems and highlighted deficiencies in categories such as driver monitoring and attention reminders. The IIHS emphasized the need for better safeguards to prevent misuse and maintain driver focus, while also noting that there is little evidence to support the claim that these systems make driving safer. The top-rated systems included Lexus Teammate with Advanced Drive, GM Super Cruise, and Nissan ProPilot Assist with Navi-Link.

"Study Finds Tesla Autopilot and Other Automated Driving Systems Rated 'Poor' for Safety"
automotive-technology2 years ago

"Study Finds Tesla Autopilot and Other Automated Driving Systems Rated 'Poor' for Safety"

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) introduced a new safety rating system for partial automated driving systems, with Tesla's Autopilot and its rivals receiving poor ratings. Of the 14 systems tested, 11 were rated as poor, including Tesla's Autopilot and Full Self-Driving version. The only system rated worse than Tesla's was Volvo's Pilot Assist. The top-rated systems were Lexus' Teammate with Advanced Drive, General Motors' Super Cruise, and Nissan's ProPILOT Assist with Navi-link, receiving acceptable and marginal ratings. The IIHS president emphasized the lack of evidence that partial automation makes driving safer, despite claims from Tesla and CEO Elon Musk. Manufacturers are expected to continue improving their systems' safety features in response to the findings.

"IIHS Finds Only One Automated Driving System Passes Safety Test"
automotive-technology2 years ago

"IIHS Finds Only One Automated Driving System Passes Safety Test"

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) tested 14 partial automated systems and found that only one, Lexus’ Teammate with Advanced Drive, passed their evaluation. The majority were rated poor, with two being marginal. The systems were found to be easily tricked and bad at monitoring driver attention, with some even working when the driver wasn’t wearing a seatbelt. IIHS noted that all vehicles did well in at least one category, suggesting that fixes may be readily available through software updates.

"IIHS Ratings: Poor Marks for Tesla and Rivals' Automated Driving Systems"
automotive-technology2 years ago

"IIHS Ratings: Poor Marks for Tesla and Rivals' Automated Driving Systems"

The U.S. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) rated Tesla's Autopilot and Full Self Driving technology, along with nine other assisted-driving systems from major automakers, as "poor" in a new study, citing no evidence of real-world safety benefits based on crash data. Only one system, Lexus Teammate with Advanced Drive, earned an acceptable rating, while GM's Super Cruise and Nissan's ProPILOT Assist with Navi-link received "marginal" ratings. The study highlights the lack of federal regulations and consistent guidance for advanced-driver assistance systems, and suggests that automakers could improve safety ratings by adopting existing technology for functions such as driver-monitoring or attention warnings.