All articles tagged with #fisheries
In a tight Alaska Senate race, independent voters lean toward Mary Peltola over incumbent Dan Sullivan, valuing authenticity and Alaska-focused issues like fishing livelihoods; the contest centers on fisheries policy, cost-of-living concerns, and a quirky ranked-choice system that includes a third candidate named Dan Sullivan, complicating the path to victory.
A Brazilian study of 53 skipjack tuna found parasites in 96% of fish, totaling over 1,600 worms across organs (kidneys and heart largely spared; intestines and muscle commonly infected). While many parasites are neutralized by cooking or canning, certain anisakid worms can cause gastrointestinal symptoms if eaten raw or undercooked. The findings stress sanitary inspection and rapid evisceration to prevent larvae migration and may affect seafood marketability; more research is needed to understand regional variability.
Italy’s blue crab situation grew into a policy headache: a 2024 eradication drive culled about 2.3 million kilograms over two years to shield mollusk fisheries, but crab numbers rebounded due to their high reproductive rate, leading authorities to shelve the program. In a bid to break the cycle, scientists released 150,000 baby octopuses into the Adriatic. Fishermen’s livelihoods remain tenuous as crabs fetch far less than clams, even as the crustacean remains a sought-after export abroad.
Counters monitoring sea trout and salmon in the River Tees, Wear and Tyne show declining numbers, with some counters non-operational or reading only estimates; the Environment Agency says it’s too early to draw conclusions but is continuing to monitor, repair equipment, and improve habitats to aid spawning. The Tyne is England’s best salmon river but could lose its 'not at risk' status by 2029 as egg deposition falls, and July counts were well below 2022 levels (Tyne 6,471 vs 11,845). The Tees recorded very low counts earlier in the year, while the Wear counter has been out of action since 2025. Unfavourable conditions and alternative migration routes may also be at play.
Iceland voted against reopening negotiations to join the European Union, prioritizing national control over fishing, farming, and other local priorities over fears tied to President Trump's Greenland gambit.
The European Commission offered a muted response to Iceland’s referendum, acknowledging the vote and reaffirming that Iceland remains a close EU partner. The result may slow the bloc’s enlargement momentum, even as Brussels seeks “creative” solutions on fisheries and agriculture. Montenegro remains the leading potential member, while Iceland’s prime minister signalled she won’t press membership again during her term. The EU aims to deliver tangible benefits to candidates and strengthen EU-Iceland ties despite the setback.
Iceland’s referendum rejected restarting EU accession talks, with 52.8% voting against and 47.2% in favor amid 82.5% turnout. Support favored joining in Reykjavík, while rural areas voted no. The result ends a long-running push that began in 2009 and stalled in 2015, driven by fishing-quotas concerns and a desire to preserve sovereignty rather than pursue euro adoption or closer EU integration.
In a knife-edge referendum, Iceland rejected the government's plan to resume EU accession talks, 52.5% to 47.5%; while non-binding, the vote will shape the future of Iceland's EU bid, with the government promising to respect it and fisheries sovereignty remaining a core concern as Iceland stays in the EEA/Schengen arrangements.
Iceland's referendum on restarting EU membership talks was too close to call in unofficial early results, with No leading 50.1% to Yes 49.9% as counting continued. Voter turnout was high, and a Yes would restart negotiations on a deal that would still require a second referendum after talks conclude and approval by all EU members; fisheries and broader economic ties to Europe are central to the debate.
After more than a decade, Iceland’s effort to join the EU is back on the table with a referendum looming on the negotiated terms. Supporters say closer European ties would bring stability and climate-policy alignment, while opponents warn membership would surrender sovereignty over Iceland’s valuable fishing grounds and policy. The government is eyeing a possible opt‑out from the EU’s common fisheries policy, and any deal would still require a final parliamentary vote before accession.
Iceland’s EU referendum is set for a razor-thin result after preliminary turnout figures show higher noon participation in Reykjavík than the 2024 election, with early voting topping 20%. A final poll puts Yes at 50.4% and No at 49.6%; a Yes would restart EU talks on about 35 areas, including fisheries, with the government divided between closer integration and preserving sovereignty.
Icelanders vote on August 29 to decide whether to restart EU accession negotiations. The ballot asks yes or no on resuming talks, not on joining the bloc, and any membership would require a second referendum and EU approval. Polls suggest a razor-thin race shaped by domestic issues like inflation and the cost of living, as well as fisheries policy and security concerns involving Russia, NATO and US commitments. The EU has indicated negotiations could resume in coming years, while Iceland’s existing EEA ties already grant broad single-market access regardless of full membership.
Canada will not apply its 25% seafood tariffs to U.S. goods, sparing Maine's lobster industry—worth about $300 million in exports—from a potential devastating blow, as Ottawa implements dollar-for-dollar tariffs that could affect roughly $20 billion in U.S. goods starting Sept. 8.
Icelanders vote on Aug. 29 to decide whether to resume EU accession talks, a knife‑edge referendum driven by concerns over the economy, sovereignty and fisheries, and set against the backdrop of U.S. pressure over Greenland and Arctic security; a yes would restart negotiations and could lead to a second referendum, while domestic issues appear to dominate the outcome.
Icelanders vote on whether to resume EU accession negotiations; a Yes would trigger tense talks with Brussels, with fisheries and the Common Fisheries Policy likely to be the main sticking points, and could lead to membership after a possible second referendum. A No would dampen EU enlargement momentum and stall membership prospects for years, keeping Iceland in the European Economic Area while narrowing the path to full Brussels membership.